HIV, AIDS 'Energy Medicine' - the Truth

HIV, AIDS 'Energy Medicine' - the Truth 450 & 683 are addressing pneumonia which is a common problem in advanced Aids 727, 787, 880 are addressing a wide variety of conditions due to a supressed immune system that the Beck zapper may take of common settings used is most sessions 465 is addressing fungi and is another very common setting used is most sessions 830 Fasciolopsis buski IMPORTANT 249 & 418 are addressing Kaposi's sarcoma which is a type cancer often found in advanced aids patients 714 is addressing HTLV-3 (human T-lymphotropic virus-3) IMPORTANT which is in Central Africa also addresses Gulf War Syndrome Also T-Lymph virus TR (terminal repeat) 1500 and 1550 address a wide variety of general conditions 3554 - HIV IMPORTANT 2489 general anti-viral

New HIV-AIDS Experimental "Energy Medicine"

New HIV-AIDS Experimental "Energy Medicine" Here is a quick run down of this experimetal method amd what each of the alleged HIV & AIDS frequencies are attempting to address. The Consolidated Frequency List gives a rather long list of frequencies for "HIV" (AIDS). Dissecting what they are intending to address, 450 & 683 are addressing pneumonia, 727, 787, 880 are addressing a wide variety of conditions due to a suppressed immune system, 465 is addressing fungi, 249 & 418 are addressing Kaposi's sarcoma. 714 is addressing HTLV-3 (human T-lymphotropic virus-3) 3554 - HIV The most important frequency would be 3554 since it is attempting to address the HIV specifically. Dr Hulda Clark Phd (micro-biologist) used different frequencies that uses a 100% positive offset, versus 0% positive offset that the frequencies on the Consolidated Frequency List used. Dr. Clark had a fairly long list of frequencies that addressed many microbes. Unlike the Royal Rife list, which may require a sweep, do to inherent inaccuracy of the 1940's equipment back then, Clark's frequencies were touted to be accurate. Although sometimes a specific high-low range was listed to sweep in an to attempt to destroy a pathogen. In the case of HIV specifically Dr. Clark listed 365000 exactly with no sweep and applying a 100% positive offset. To use both these alleged HIV frequencies in the same Spooky2 generator, you would use 2 DNA holder remotes. The 1st output would be generating the frequency 3554, square wave, 5 volts, 50% duty cycle and 0% offset. To set the 2nd output to 365000, use the setting "follow Out 1" and the Out 2 frequency would equal Out 1 times 1 plus 361446. The 361446 plus the 3554 will equal 365000. Then set Out 2 to 100% positive offset as required by Dr. Hulda Clark Phd (microbiologist). Out 2 will also be square-wave, 50% duty cycle and 5 volts. Despite the low cost, this is maybe the best or at least one of the very best Rife machines available. The work of Royal Rife is still famous today, although exactly what Royal Rife did to achieve such outstanding results against cancer seems to elude most independent researchers. The theory of using frequencies to decrease, eliminate or harm microbes, viruses, bacteria and other pathogens seems to good merit and many have claimed good results to varying degrees. The biggest drawback to a Rife machine that is customizable and can handle multiple frequencies and carrier waves has always been the cost. That is until now. The "Spooky2", released in 2014 is now available. It is free software programs that drives an excellent quality frequency generator. See Spooky2.com for all the details. I neither sell for or have any financial connection to Spooky2.com, but rather I am offering my opinion on what I think is a fantastic, breakthrough device at an extremely affordable price. Perhaps with the experimentation efforts of many people across the globe, a more effective, very low cost treatment may be found for treating such harmful and traditionally expensive diseases as Cancer, Hiv and Lyme. I explain that the term "spooky" is used in reference to "quantum entanglement". www.SPOOKY2.com

Possible Alt Treatments for HIV - Various subjects.

Other videos on the subject are listed below, if you need further research. These videos may or may not help as hiv has been an extremely tough disease to fight. But first do beware of those that still claim that hiv is harmless. Many in the "alternative" world of medicine seem to like to quote Dr Peter Duesberg as their rationale why they think hiv is harmless. This is some very serious misinformation. There are some claims that some of these "alternative" methods do have good effect o hiv and there are numerous studies i the established medical field to show they have some merit - although they are typically much, much less effective than the standard haart (highly active antiretroviral therapy) therapy. In a few cases some have claimed outstanding results and it may the dosage or combination of "alternative" therapies that has better effect. So I present these ideas as possible methods that may be helpful to people who can not afford highly active antiretroviral therapy (HAART) that maybe they may find an affordable option. In certain other cases some people can not tolerate highly active antiretroviral therapy (HAART). Everything I listed here is actually listed on conventional medicine and government websites, even though they are not used as standard treatments for hiv. You can read what the medical professionals have to say, as they also mainly agree they herbs and other methods have some usefulness, although they are regarded as not strong enough to bring about satisfactory results. Dr Peter Duesberg - How is he coming up w' his hiv claims? http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lkAuySP4r2s Selenium - a "Miracle" Trace Element? http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=X7niro9ZiSQ OZONE Rectal Insufflation - A Strong Medicine http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Z9-FjJy_nkA Are these HIV hindering Frequencies?? http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Vn35a9EBIQw Was Bob Beck hiding the Secrets of Lakhovsky? http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hM6iJASlK5c AMA Cartel & Flexner Against Royal Rife Healing Frequencies http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=A2bgW8LK11A

Dr Peter Duesberg - How is he coming up w' his hiv claims?

Dr Peter Duesberg - How is he coming up w' his hiv claims? I can't fathom the rational for Dr. Peter Duesberg's arguments regarding hiv & aids. Dr Duesberg's qualifications are light-years ahead of any medical knowledge I have, but I have to look at the results of people who had very high hiv viral loads and low T-Cell (CD-4 cell) counts prior to hiv anti-viral treatment and then the how with the drugs the T-cells and immune system recovered. It's just a plain fact. To tell people that hiv is harmless, as Dr Peter Duesberg seems to allege is putting many people's lives in severe jeopardy in my opinion. Dr Duesberg opinion on hiv is certainly in the minority and is in direct conflict with the vast majority of the established medical community. Many in the "alternative" health field seem to like to quote Dr. Duesberg, but to do so is discrediting the "alternative" health field. People in "alternative" health seem to like to find anything that could attack established medicine due to the extreme cost & also problems with side-effects of pharmaceutical drugs. They feel there is a conspiracy to not find cures and only sell expensive treatments, which may actually be a fact among the highest echelons of the medical community, but true with the vast majority of medical professionals. But my instinct tells me perhaps (just "perhaps") there is a deeper conspiracy to misinform the "alternative" medical community and thus discredit them and cause new legislation to be enacted to stop any independent research on medical treatment methods. So beware my friends. I try to take information from real doctors and also verify that information with various people who said an "alternative" method worked. And even if it looks very legit, I will not say it is gospel and also even what may work for most people may not work for all people. The body is very complicated and many times even the best medicines and treatments are not 100% effective. So it is best to err on the side of caution and tone-down over-exuberance as that can lead to disastrous results. I think Dr. Peter Duesberg statements on hiv are a mixed with truth but the entire logic in his conclusions is extremely flawed. Some decent and cheap hiv "alternative" treatments MIGHT be selenium, astragalus and olive leaf extract. But even so they may not come anywhere close to the power of true hiv anti-viral drugs. I only offer this suggestion for those who have absolutely no access to the hiv drugs due to cost. Please do your own research and try to verify my suggestion before you embark on a plan for yourself.

Was Bob Beck Not Telling Us the Best Cures??

Was Bob Beck Not Telling Us the Best Cures?? Compared to the information that Dr. Bob Beck Phd gave us with the "Beck Protocol" and what Bob Beck actually knew regarding the highest scientific achievements in electro-medicine it appears that Bob Beck left out many very important pearls of wisdom when he lectured his audiences on his "miracle cures". There seems to be a number of red flags that go up, now that I carefully review his claims and statements. Quite obviously the "Beck Protocol" (although very useful) falls very short of Beck's claims. He person of his stellar scientific achievement, in my opinion, does not make gross errors or exaggerations. Those type of things are usually found within the unprofessional crowd of weekend tinkers. Bob Beck obviously never shared the secrets of Georges Lakhovsky and also made some very curious statements regarding Dr. Royal Rife. Was Bob Beck not telling us much of the best cures that have been discovered and now are suppressed? Bob Beck Jan 24, 1999 The Bob Beck Protocol Part 1 of 11 Aids HIV Cure http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FHfBPcdPQWI At 3 mins 30 sec. They beat up Bob Beck after he comes out of his NYC hotel and someone films it from across the street with a telephoto lenses. Was that actually done to convince you of something? That Beck is a persecuted crusader? At 6 mins 20 sec he talks about the suppressed cure for all diseases found by Lyman and Kaali in 1991 in The Albert Einstein College of Medicine in NYC, yet Bob Beck knew and fully about the Georges Lakhovsky machine in 1963 and was fully capable of getting that machine running and found it was o hoax. Lakhovsky's machine had a 98% cure rate in terminal patients ad could actually reverse age people by restoring cell vitality. Did Bob Beck grow his hair back with a magnetic pulser, as he claimed or did he use Lakhovsky's machine. Ever hear of anyone getting hair restoration results like Bob Beck with a magnetic pulser? I certainly have not. The Bob Beck Protocol Part 5 of 11 Aids HIV Cure http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JlxdDpbER4c At 20 seconds he says Dr. Royal Rife did not cure anything unless the patient actually contacted the electrical current. Beck says Rife machines don't work. The Bob Beck Protocol Part 9 of 11 Aids HIV Cure http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=C2WGO41rbXw At 5 mins and 46 secs he says he has to go cure some people in the CIA who contracted Aids and the methods he outlined are the only cure. He can't say where he was going to do this. He also says the government is curing CIA agents with aids in secret and the cure Bob Beck outlined is the only thing that works. The Bob Beck Protocol Part 10 of 11 Aids HIV Cure http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Px77FxowVY4 At 5 mins and 45 secs he talks about women from Iraq and Iran smuggling into the USA in their body cavities biological germ warfare microbes to kill off millions in the USA. He says this after a talking about how WWIII will mainly be waged with biological weapons because they don't want to destroy the real estate.

Experiment: Would 2 Bob Beck Zappers Mixed be Better?

Experiment:Would 2 Bob Beck Zappers Mixed be Better? When 2 or more frequencies are mixed the end result is many frequencies that would cover a large portion of the Consolidated Frequency List - CAFL. Possibly, it may be better to mix 2 Beck zapper devices and thus produce many different frequencies. As a theory, certain microbes are harmed by different frequencies depending upon which microbe it is. Versus running sweeps using 1 frequency at a time, would it be simpler and easier to just mix frequencies? By constructing two zappers, that theoretically would result in many different frequencies and thus possibly disrupt & destroy more microbes. I present this theoretical idea because constructing two simple zappers and mixing the frequencies from those 2 simple Beck zappers would be much easier to do than to design a complex program to run a zapper. Plus a single zapper could only run one simple square wave frequency at a time. It's an idea that maybe should be tested. It may be that the medicine of the past, when electricity was new, will be the main medicine of the future. This may be a radical new approach to the Beck blood electrification protocol.

Was Bob Beck hiding the Secrets of Lakhovsky?

Was Bob Beck hiding the Secrets of Lakhovsky? In 1963, it was Dr Bob Beck Phd. who found a Georges Lakhovsky multi-wave oscillator machine that is potentially capable of regenerating life and healing the body. It was Bob Beck who figured out how to get the multi-wave oscillator machine up and running again in only a few hours while others had failed. This was in 1963 and 3 decades before Bob Beck made his simple square wave zapper. Why is it that Bob Beck talks about not understanding Rife or multiple frequencies in his speeches in the 1990's (30 years after he obviously knew exactly how the Lakhovsky machine worked) and pushed his simple (and still usefuel ) zapper as a "cure-all". Would not the Lakhovsky multi-wave oscillator machine been much more effective and closer to a real "cure-all". Georges Lakhovsky was killed (obviously murdered) when struck by a limousine in 1942 when he traveled to NYC from France to observe the miracle healing effects of his machine. Immediately after Lakhovsky's death, the machines were removed from the hospital despite having a 98% success rate in curing otherwise terminal cancer and other diseases. Quite obviously sinister forces were at work. In 1939 Lakhovsky published "The Secret of Life" which was when the world's attention was on the invasion of Poland by Hitler. It is a very obvious fact, that if Lakhovsky's multi-wave oscillator machine even worked 10% as good as it was touted to perform, many, many millions of $dollars could have been saved in medical treatment for injured WWII veterans and much pain and suffering would have been avoided. It is quite obvious that the "elite" have other plans for us. And it is even more obvious that the average person will never take any action of their own to look into these theories or keep the idea alive. The ideas of Lakhovsky did not die mainly because of the "elite" but rather by a lethargic public who must be spoon-fed everything and told what to do. The average person follows Hollywood like a Pavlov dog. http://altered-states.net/barry/newsletter167/ http://journal.borderlands.com/1963/review-waves-that-heal-mwo/